Between diagnostic testing, respiratory therapies, CPAP/DME supplies, and sleep studies, there are more moving parts that make pulmonology billing complex. Errors in any link lead straight to denials, and that’s where partnering with a skilled medical billing company can make all the difference.
Here are the top five denial triggers in pulmonology, why they matter, and how to sidestep them so your claims get paid faster.
1. Authorization or Precertification Failures
If your practice skips obtaining prior authorizations, or misses renewals or expiration, it’s one of the quickest ways a claim gets rejected. Pulmonology often involves pricey diagnostic procedures (like CT scans, imaging, and certain sleep studies) or durable equipment that insurers require preapproval for.
Why it’s a big deal
- Without authorization, even clinically valid services might be denied.
- Policies change, so what was covered last year might not be now.
How to avoid it
- Maintain a tracking system that alerts your team when authorizations are needed and when they expire.
- Train front-desk or scheduler staff to check the payer’s authorization rules at the time of scheduling, not wait until claim submission.
- If possible, use software that integrates payer auth rules with your EHR or billing tool.
2. Coding Errors and Modifier Misuse
In pulmonology, codes must reflect very precise details, such as procedure type, location, laterality, diagnoses, and any add-ons. Mistakes like using outdated ICD-10 codes, misapplying modifiers (e.g., missing Modifier 25 when an E/M visit is billed with a procedure), or not following payer-specific bundling rules are frequent triggers.
Sources show pulmonology practices can see higher denial rates than average due to coding inaccuracy.
Common Scenarios
- Pairing diagnostic testing with an office visit without a proper modifier.
- Submitting bundled procedures incorrectly.
- Using generic diagnosis codes without supporting specificity (e.g., respiratory disease with insufficient documentation to support severity or nature).
Prevention Tips
- Regular coding audits focused on pulmonology-specific procedures: PFTs, sleep studies, COPD, and respiratory rehab.
- Up-to-date training on CPT/ICD and payer rules.
- Use an in-house or external review process before claims go out.
3. Incomplete or Insufficient Documentation
Even with perfect coding, a lack of documentation kills claims. Payers need proof: clinical notes that match billed services, test results (e.g., lung function, oxygen saturation), time logs, follow-ups, etc. Without clear documentation, “medical necessity” is hard to demonstrate. Sources list incomplete documentation as one of the major denial causes in pulmonology billing.
What Often Gets Missed
- Clinical time logs for chronic respiratory management or oxygen therapy.
- Test reports (e.g., spirometry results) or objective data tied to diagnosis.
- Follow-up notes or education documentation (for long-term therapy or rehab).
How to Fix it
- Implement documentation templates in your EHR specific to pulmonology cases.
- Ensure providers supply objective test data along with narrative justification.
- Regular chart audits & feedback loops.
4. Eligibility and Patient Information Problems
Small errors up front can cause big headaches down the line. This includes wrong policy numbers, expired insurance, incorrect details in patient registration, and failed verification of benefits or eligibility. In pulmonology, many services are expensive, and coverage gaps are costly.
Examples
- A CPAP device billed but patient insurance no longer covers durable medical equipment under that plan.
- Patient demographic data mismatches between what’s in EHR vs what payer has.
Ways to Avoid
- Verify insurance and eligibility shortly before the service or test (preferably day before or day of).
- Use real-time eligibility tools or software.
- Train registration staff to collect complete info: date of birth, policy number, payer name, group number, and verify coverage for specific services.
5. Misuse of Bundled Services and Modifiers
Pulmonology involves many procedures and tests that can be bundled or unbundled under certain rules. Misapplying bundles, or failing to understand when modifiers are needed, is a common trigger.
Also, improper usage of modifiers, such as 25 or a modifier for telehealth, or a modifier for a separate procedure, can lead to denials or reductions in payment.
Specific Pitfalls
- Billing a sleep study plus titration or follow‐up session without a proper modifier or documentation.
- Combining pulmonary diagnostic tests (e.g. PFT components) incorrectly.
- Submitting an office visit plus a diagnostic procedure on the same day without showing distinct services and applying necessary modifiers.
How to Fix
- Map out common bundles for your practice and train coders and clinicians on when they apply and when they do not.
- Include modifiers only when documentation supports them (e.g. separate, distinct services).
- Use clearinghouse or billing software that flags potential bundling or modifier conflicts.
Wrap Up Tips
Avoiding denials in pulmonology is less about guessing and more about systemizing. Practices that treat billing as an ongoing project see far better financial health. Having a strong partner, such as a medical billing company that specializes in pulmonology, can bridge many gaps. Here are a few wrap-up tips:
- Monitor denial rates by type (authorization, modifier, documentation, eligibility) to see where your clinic leaks the most.
- Build standard workflows with checkpoints (e.g. before the claim leaves billing) to catch obvious errors.
- Use technology, such as automated eligibility checks, claim scrubbing, and dashboards for denials, to give visibility.
- Train everyone, including those on the front desk, clinical staff, and billing personnel. Denial prevention is everyone’s job.
Conclusion
Denials in pulmonology billing can feel like invisible taxes, and minor cuts here and there add up. If your revenue cycle is getting stalled by missing authorizations, coding missteps, weak documentation, eligibility mistakes, or modifier misuse, you’re not alone. But you can fix these. With structured processes, dedicated auditing, and possibly bringing in a specialized partner, many pulmonology practices turn the tide.
Leave a Reply